国王与国家

国王与国家

本片由金海剧场提供播放

战争片
立即播放
导演:
上映:
1964
更新:
2024-11-10 10:29
剧情:
ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectw..
天空线路

猜你喜欢

终守阿勒波
2017 10.0分 战争片
内详  /
After five years of war in Syria, Aleppo's remaining residents prepare themselves for a siege. Khalid, Subhi and Mahmoud, founding members of The White Helmets, have remained in the city to help ..
超清
狼嚎
2019 9.0分 战争片
一个年轻人有一种罕见的礼物,可以识别他听到的每一个声音。在一艘法国核潜艇上,一切都依赖于他,金耳朵。 看上去绝对可靠,他犯了一个错误,让船员处于死亡的危险之中。他希望重新获得同志的信任,但他的追求会让他们陷入更加戏剧化的境地。 在核威慑和错误信息的世界中,他们发现自己被困在一个无法控制的装备中。
超清
捍卫者
2017 7.0分 战争片
一九三七年八月三十一日淞沪会战中,姚子青奉命率部五百余人守卫宝山县城。日军为扩大登陆地域,对宝山进行了海陆空协同的疯狂攻击。在装备落后,地势不利,没有援军的情况下,智勇双全的姚子青带领全营以寡敌众坚守孤城,灵活运用战术战略,从主动出击攻袭敌军到固守阵地顽强抵御,七日内击退了日军一次又一次的进攻,全营五百余人先后战死沙场。九月七日日军破城,姚子青率残部二十余人在城内展开激烈巷战,最终壮烈殉国。
超清
茶缘
2020 10.0分 战争片
内详  /
清朝统治下,清廷对苗族的歧视和压迫尤为严重,军事镇压也甚是严重。经济上,在苗区安设屯田,强夺农民土地;政治上,实行改土归流,设置流官;军事上,建立营汛屯堡。苗人不服,抗暴。清统治历史上发生过三次起义。永绥厅夯岩右营把总赵志龙在苗区爱上了一个苗族姑娘茶花,而他又负责镇压起义的苗人,在这战火纷飞的年代,他的这份爱又该如何表达,他对皇上的军令又该如何执行?
正片
他们已不再变老
2019 7.0分 战争片
内详  /
《他们已不再变老》是由华纳兄弟影业出品,奥斯卡金像奖获奖导演彼得·杰克逊(《指环王》三部曲,《霍比特人》三部曲)执导的战争纪录片。电影聚焦于1914年—1918年一战士兵的日常生活。片中大部分史料均为首次公开,制作团队应用最顶尖修复、上色及3D 技术,将百年前影像进行全彩修复并重新加入声效,以英国老兵口述史为旁白还原一战士兵遭遇和感受,为观众呈现身临其境、极度真实的沉浸式战争体验。影片将于201..
超清

《国王与国家》剧情介绍

金海剧场提供影视作品国王与国家高清全集在线观看的影视全集网,战争片《国王与国家》全集作品的导演是约瑟夫·罗西   ,由德克·博加德  汤姆·康特奈  莱奥·麦凯恩  巴里·福斯特  彼得·科普利  詹姆斯·维利尔斯  杰瑞米·斯宾塞  Barry Justice  Vivian Matalon  基思·巴克利   James Hunter  Larry Taylor  主演,国王与国家在豆瓣的评分为7.0,本片由小编于2024-11-10 10:29更新,希望大家喜欢,可以把《国王与国家》推荐给你朋友,本作品的地址为 https://www.jinhaiju.com/movie/index77971.html

《国王与国家》简介:

ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.

加载中...