国王与国家

国王与国家

本片由金海剧场提供播放

战争片
立即播放
导演:
上映:
1964
更新:
2024-11-10 10:29
剧情:
ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectw..
天空线路

猜你喜欢

深山狙击
2025 10.0分 战争片
1938年春,日军侵占了我国胶东地区,昆嵛山深处的天道村被日军选为中心据点区,日军派少佐渡边太郎率领一支日军前去天道村清除障碍,一个世代以打猎为生的村庄,面对日军的突然入侵,浴血反击,上演一场血与火的青春史诗。
HD国语
望乡
1974 8.0分 战争片
  基于各种原因,自幕府末期至昭和初期,日本大批穷苦人家的女孩被贩卖到南洋当妓女,世称“南洋姐”。她们的命运坎坷,受尽人世间的屈辱。有些人客死他乡,有些即使回到故乡,却仍要承受世俗鄙夷的目光。  女性史学家三谷圭子(栗原小卷 饰)为了调查和解开这段历史,走访了九州天草的崎津町 ,不过她的采访并不顺利,曾经历那个年代的老人们对此皆闭口不谈,讳莫如深。偶然间,她在路边冷饮店邂逅曾当过南洋姐的阿崎婆(..
HD中字
迷失的巡逻兵
1934 7.0分 战争片
  一次世界大战期间,一队英国军队里的巡逻军正在穿越美索不达米亚沙漠,他们的指挥官,那个唯一知道他们的目的的人,在行进途中却被来自隐蔽的土匪的一颗子弹射死了。 巡逻军的卫士通过各种方法保持部队向北方前行,他们假定一直向北走就可以遇到他们的大部队。当精疲力竭人仰马乏的他们发现一片绿洲,他们在这片绿洲歇息了一夜,第二天,当他们醒来的时候,他们发现,他们的马匹被偷光了,他们的哨兵也死了,环绕着这片绿洲..
HD中字
关塔那摩之路
2006 9.0分 战争片
  《关塔纳摩之路》聚焦于美军攻打阿富汗期间,无故关押和非人虐待三位到阿富汗提供人道援助的英国穆斯林,并把他们在古巴关塔纳摩监狱里囚禁两年的事件。
HD中字

《国王与国家》剧情介绍

金海剧场提供影视作品国王与国家高清全集在线观看的影视全集网,战争片《国王与国家》全集作品的导演是约瑟夫·罗西   ,由德克·博加德  汤姆·康特奈  莱奥·麦凯恩  巴里·福斯特  彼得·科普利  詹姆斯·维利尔斯  杰瑞米·斯宾塞  Barry Justice  Vivian Matalon  基思·巴克利   James Hunter  Larry Taylor  主演,国王与国家在豆瓣的评分为7.0,本片由小编于2024-11-10 10:29更新,希望大家喜欢,可以把《国王与国家》推荐给你朋友,本作品的地址为 https://www.jinhaiju.com/movie/index77971.html

《国王与国家》简介:

ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.

加载中...